CAROLINE WEISS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JACK J. WEISS, DECEASED, PETITIONER,
v.
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT
CAROLINE WEISS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JACK J. WEISS, DECEASED, PETITIONER,
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT
899 So. 2d 1082
Florida Supreme Court (2005)
Caution
Cited by 65 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Weiss, 790 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.
LEWIS and CANTERO, JJ., recused.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (60 total)
-
State v. Hearns, 961 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 2007)…non of statutory construction ejusdem generis, which states that when a general phrase follows a list of specifics, the general phrase will be interpreted to include only items of the same type as those listed. See Fayad v. Clarendon Nat’l Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1082, 1088-89 (Fla.2005). Therefore, the general phrase “any other felony involving the use or threat of physical force or violence” should be interpreted to' include only offenses which involve a level of physical force or violence comparable to that of…
-
Sosa v. Safeway Premium Fin. Co., 73 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 2011)…Bosem v. Musa Holdings, Inc., 46 So. 3d 42, 44 (Fla.2010) (citing So. Baptist Hosp. of Fla., Inc. v. Welker, 908 So. 2d 317, 319 (Fla.2005), and D’Angelo v. Fitzmaurice, 863 So. 2d 311, 314 (Fla.2003)); see, e.g., Fayad v. Clarendon Nat’l Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1082, 1085 (Fla.2005) (applying the de novo standard of review in an assessment of whether Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal reached a correct conclusion of law with regard to the application of an exclusion in an all-risk insurance policy). This…1 / 2
-
Wash. Nat'l Ins. Corp. v. Sydelle Ruderman, 117 So. 3d 943 (Fla. 2013)…the above-stated main question and sub-questions to this Court. Id. at 1212. ANALYSIS The issue in this case concerns construction of an insurance policy which is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Fayad, v. Clarendon Nat’l Ins. Co., 899 So. 2d 1082, 1085 (Fla.2005). Where the language in an insurance contract is plain and unambiguous, a court must interpret the policy in accordance with the plain meaning so as to give effect to the policy as written. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Menen…
Previewing 3 of 60 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Weiss, 790 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)