GLYNELL TOMLIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2005-04-12
No. 1D03-3410
ERVIN, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
898 So. 2d 275 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Glynell Tomlin appeals from the revocation of his probation. He contends the revocation was not supported by the great er weight of the evidence, and the written revocation order does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. We affirm the revocation, but remand for correction of the written order. See Koch v. State, 888 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Taylor v. State, 840 So. 2d 371, 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Williams v. State, 886 So. 2d 1078, 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Turner v. State, 873 So. 2d 480, 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw