JOHN G. IMMER, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that mandamus was an inappropriate remedy because there was a disputed factual issue regarding property ownership, and the permit holder was an indispensable party who was not joined.
[1] A permit holder must be joined as a party defendant in an action seeking to cancel the permit.
[2] Mandamus is not an available remedy when the right to relief depends on the determination of controverted questions of fact.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner sought a writ of mandamus to compel the City to cancel a building permit issued to The Moorings Property Owners Association. The Associatio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Joinder Of Parties cases and more on FLexlaw
COPE, J.
John G. Immer appeals an order denying his petition for writ of mandamus, filed in the circuit court. According to the petition, petitioner Immer asked the City of Miami to cancel a building permit issued to The Moorings Property Owners Association. The City refused to do so.
Immer filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court, requesting an order directing the City to cancel the building permit. In an action to cancel a building permit, the holder of the permit must be joined as a party defendant. Immer failed to join the permit holder — the Association — -as a party to the proceeding. We conclude that dismissal was appropriate because Immer failed to join an indispensable party. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.140(h); City of Deland v. State ex rel. Watts, 423 So. 2d 529, 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); see also Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. 2000 Island Blvd., Inc., 698 So. 2d 309, 311-12 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
The trial court ruled that mandamus was the incorrect remedy. Under the circumstances present here, we agree. The petition and attachments reveal that there is a disputed factual-issue in the case. In applying for the building permit, the Association swore that it was the owner of the land on which the proposed gatehouse was to be constructed. Immer asserts that he is a lot owner, in The Moorings and an attorney specializing in real estate. He states that in his opinion the operative real estate documents make the lot owners (not the Association) the owners of the land on which the gatehouse is to be constructed.
Since there is a factual dispute regarding ownership of the property, mandamus is not an available remedy. “[R]elief cannot be afforded by mandamus where the right to which relator claims he clearly is entitled depends on the determination of controverted questions of faet[ ].” State ex rel. Blatt v. Panelfab Int’l Corp., 314 So. 2d 196, 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); see also Morse Diesel, 698 So. 2d at 312; City of Deland, 423 So. 2d at 530-31; Florence v. Walton County, 593 So. 2d 1217, 1218 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Villa Bellini Ristorante & Lounge, Inc. v. Ciro Mancini, 283 So. 3d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)…GE 11--- expired and/or been satisfied." Id. at 312. "In granting the writ, we think that the court improperly adjudicated rather than enforced an established right to these funds by Williams Island." Id. Similarly, in Immer v. City of Miami, 898 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), the Third District affirmed a circuit court's denial of a petition for writ of mandamus where the petitioner sought to direct the City of Miami to cancel a building permit that had been issued to a homeowners' association. Th…
-
Mehl v. Tucker, 71 So. 3d 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…is petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit where he was then confined without exhausting all of his administrative remedies with the Department. The circuit court dismissed the petition as premature, which is consistent with Pope v. State, 898 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (upholding trial court’s dismissal of habeas petition where inmate failed to allege exhaustion of administrative remedies). During the pendency of this certiorari proceeding, the supreme court disapproved Pope, ruling that a cou…
-
Traska v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Brevard Cnty. (Fla. 5th DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Morse Diesel Int'l, Inc. v. 2000 Island Boulevard, Inc., 698 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- State v. Panelfab Int'l Corp., 314 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Waite v. State, 423 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- The City OF DeLAND v. The State of Fla. ex rel. C. Allen Watts, 423 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Florence v. Walton Cnty., 593 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)