GEROME DARELL RANDLE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2005-04-07
No. 1D04-3661
WEBSTER, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
897 So. 2d 554 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Gerome Darell Randle petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he is entitled to pre-trial release on reasonable conditions and that the monetary bail set by the trial court is excessive and unreasonable in the circumstances. The State of Florida, in its response to the petition, asserts without contradiction that material facts which were presented to the trial court at the hearing on Randle’s motion for bond reduction have substantially changed in that Randle was discharged from the United States Navy in the interim. We agree and find that this proceeding is essentially moot as a consequence, and deny the petition for that reason.

PETITION DENIED.

WEBSTER, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …aring, and this appeal follows. “Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists, after all reasonable inferences have been drawn in favor of the party opposing summary judgment.” Hinson v. Anderson Columbia Co., Inc., 897 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (citing Floyd v. Homes Beautiful Constr. Co., 710 So. 2d 177, 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)). An order granting final summary judgment is reviewed de novo to determine whether issues of material fact exist and whether the moving party…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw