A.W., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2005-03-30
No. 3D04-1313
Before RAMIREZ, WELLS and SUAREZ, JJ.
897 So. 2d 551 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 776.041(2), Fla. Stat. (2003).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Morales v. State, 909 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …endant filed the current motion to correct illegal sentence, alleging vindictive sentencing. We have held that a vindictive sentencing claim cannot be [*479] brought by a motion to correct illegal sentence under Rule 3.800(a). See Gonzalez v. State, 897 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Taylor v. State, 897 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Reese v. State, 896 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Luma v. State, 895 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Satahoo v. State, 895 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Galindez v. State, 89…
  • Martinez v. State, 904 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …74] PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant’s vindictive sentencing claim may not be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Gonzalez v. State, 897 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Reese v. State, 896 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Wright v. State, 891 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Bouno v. State, 900 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Affirmed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw