HOOVER REED, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2005-02-02
No. 3D05-13
Before COPE, GREEN, and WELLS, JJ.
891 So. 2d 1211 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Benitez v. Odalis D. Benitez, 976 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
    …The specific theories need not be addressed. The former husband agreed not to seek modification for any reason. He is in breach of his obligations by moving for modification. The trial court correctly dismissed the petition. See Ferraro v. Ferraro, 891 So. 2d 1211, 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw