MATTHEW HAWLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2005-01-26
No. 4D03-4475
FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
891 So. 2d 1154 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2005)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was re-sentenced after successfully moving to correct his initial sentence, which exceeded the statutory maximum. We reverse ’ and remand the sentence imposed at re-sentencing, because appellant was not represented by counsel at re-sentencing and the record does not show his knowing waiver of the right to counsel. See State v. Scott, 439 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1983); Behrman v. State, 696 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1997); Chestnut v. State, 578 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)

REVERSED and REMANDED.

FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw