D.A., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, APPELLEE
D.A., APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, APPELLEE
888 So. 2d 128
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Caution
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After a careful review we find no basis for overturning the trial court’s dependency adjudication.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Torin Robinson v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
-
Riviere v. State, 965 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…that the statute of limitations expired before the State filed charges against him. The postconviction court correctly found that Riviere’s allegation should have been raised in a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(a)(1); Morgan v. State, 888 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (holding that the defendant’s claim that the statute of limitations had expired on several counts before the State filed its information was an attack on both his conviction and sentence and should be raised pursuant to rule 3.850…
-
McGREGOR v. State, 933 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…evidence in the record showing that the state conducted a reasonable search in an attempt to locate the appellant so it is unclear whether the time period could have been extended by three years. See § 775.15(6), Fla. Stat. (1995); Morgan v. State, 888 So. 2d 128, 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(holding that an evidentiary healing would be required to determine whether the statute of limitations would have been extended for an additional three years). Even if the additional time was applicable to the appellant’s case…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence