DAVID WEIMORTS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
DAVID WEIMORTS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
110 Fla. 337
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 148 So. 876
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the-said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, BrowN and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
F. & R. Corp. v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc'y, 138 Fla. 534 (Fla. 1939)…endant. Sec. R. G. S., 4363 C. G. L.; Stephens v. Tampa Electric Co., 81 Fla. 512, 88 So. 303; Fla. East Coast Ry. Co. v. Davis, 96 Fla. 171, 117 So. 842; Biscayne Trust Co. v. Penn. Sugar Co., et al., 103 Fla. 155, 137 So. 147; Gardner v. Goertner, 110 Fla. 337, 149 So. 186. There is much discussion of other matters in the briefs but a discussion of them by us is not essential to the disposition of the case. If defendant had failed to prove his plea, which the replication treated and recognized as a good…