MAURICE HOLLOMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MAURICE HOLLOMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
882 So. 2d 398
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla.1999); Koch v. State, 874 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb.13, 2004).
PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edrulfo Antonio Largaespada v. Largaespada, 920 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…pted offer cannot form the basis of an enforceable agreement. See State v. Family Bank of Hallandale, 623 So. 2d 474, 480 (Fla.1993)(“Absent mutual assent, neither the contract nor any of its provisions come into existence.”); City Of Miami v. Case, 882 So. 2d 398, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(“In order for there to be a legally enforceable agreement, whether oral or in writing, the parties must have had a meeting of the minds, i.e., an agreement, as to its essential terms.”), review denied, 909 So. 2d 861 (Fla.200…
Authorities Cited
- Tucker v. State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1999)
- Koch v. State, 874 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)