BRIAN PRYOR, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
BRIAN PRYOR, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
881 So. 2d 692
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner filed a motion in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion as untimely. We treat the petitioner’s notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. See Davis v. State, 745 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
ERVIN, PADOVANO and, LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gessa v. Manor Care OF Fla., Inc., 4 So. 3d 679 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…o. 234 v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc., 66 So. 2d 818, 821-22 (Fla.1953) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Wilderness Country Club P’ship v. Groves, 458 So. 2d 769, 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Gold, Vann & White, P.A. v. Friedenstab, 881 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Here, the trial court reviewed the document that contained the arbitration agreement and limitation provision and determined that the limitation provision was not an integral part of the parties’ agreement to settle claims by a…
Authorities Cited
- Davis v. State, 745 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)