FIRST PROFESSIONALS INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
HEALTHMARK OF WALTON, INC., D/B/A WALTON REGIONAL HOSPITAL, AND LINDA YELL, AN INDIVIDUAL, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-08-24
No. 1D04-2645
WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ, concur.
881 So. 2d 98 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of June 28, 2004, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974); Monticello Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 743 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA1999).

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and LEWIS, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …(holding that, in circumstances involving a due process violation, the administrative agency has the authority to reissue a final order despite the lack of a specific grant of such authority in chapter 120); Solease v. Constr. Indus. Licensing Bd., 881 So. 2d 98, 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (recognizing that “an agency has authority to vacate and reenter otherwise final orders in order to avoid due process problems”). As to appellant’s final argument, we affirm without further comment. Affirmed. STEVENS…
  • Filarski v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Comm'n, 97 So. 3d 278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    …untimely due to the appellant’s negligence, reissuance is appropriate where the time to appeal expires before the appellant has notice that the agency has entered the final order.”) (Emphasis added.) See also Sclease v. Constr. Indus. Licensing Bd., 881 So. 2d 98, 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (citing Milling-er for the proposition that “an agency has authority to vacate and reenter otherwise final orders in order to avoid due process problems”). Millinger makes it clear that an administrative agency may vacate an…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw