BOONE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
JOHN CARMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-08-24
No. 1D03-2504
ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
881 So. 2d 94 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier and the claimant in this workers’ compensation case challenge various aspects of the final order entered by the judge of compensation claims. Although the judge erred in failing to authorize the employer/carrier to take a crédit in the amount of temporary partial disability benefits already paid for the period of January 1, 2001 through February 25, 2001, against amounts payable for temporary total disability benefits awarded for that same period of time, we otherwise find no error in the order under review. Accordingly, except as to the failure to authorize the credit, the order is affirmed, and this case is remanded for the judge to authorize an appropriate credit.

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • CHUBB Grp. Ins. Co. & Dialamerica, Inc. v. Major D. Easthagen, II, 889 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
    …on this court’s recent opinions reaffirming that it is within the province of the JCC to determine whether a settlement agreement was reached, and if so, to establish its terms, the JCC’s order to the contrary is reversed. See Gerow v. Yesterday’s, 881 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Jacobsen v. [*113] Ross Stores, 882 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur. . This court has jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.180(b)(1)(A), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (2004).…
  • Divosta Bldg. Corp. v. Rienzi, 892 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …that it is within the province of the Judge of Compensation Claims to determine whether a settlement agreement was reached, the order to the contrary is reversed. See Jacobsen v. Ross Stores, 882 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Gerow v. Yesterday’s, 881 So. 2d 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The case is remanded for a ruling on the motion to enforce the settlement. REVERSED and REMANDED. BARFIELD and KAHN, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., concurs with written opinion.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw