EDDIE E. NEWINGHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2004-08-20
No. 5D03-3602
GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
881 So. 2d 83 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, J.

THOMPSON, J.

Eddie E. Newingham appeals his designation as a sexual predator based solely upon his criminal conviction pursuant to section 775.21(4)(a)(l)(a), Florida Statutes. Newingham contends that the statute is unconstitutional because it violates the right to procedural due process. We affirm because we have held the statute constitutional. Metaxotos v. State, 876 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA July 7, 2004); Johnson v. State, 875 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 5th DCA July 2, 2004); Martin v. State, 864 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Miller v. State, 861 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As we have done previously, we certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Granoff v. Seidle, 915 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …c., 793 So. 2d 912, 915 (Fla. 2001) ("A prevailing party is entitled to recover from the losing party 'all his or her legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment.' § 57.041, Florida Statutes.”). . See Seminole County v. Koziara, 881 So. 2d 83, 85 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) ("[T]he County is entitled to recover at least some costs under the state statute because section 57.041(1) 'mandates that a party recovering a judgment is entitled, as a matter of right, to recover lawful court costs.'") (qu…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw