IN THE INTEREST OF D.A.G. AND T.G., CHILDREN. D.Z. AND D.P., APPELLANTS,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
IN THE INTEREST OF D.A.G. AND T.G., CHILDREN. D.Z. AND D.P., APPELLANTS,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
878 So. 2d 482
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2004)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
D.Z. and D.P. (the Relatives), the maternal great-grandfather and the maternal grandmother, respectively, of D.A.G. and T.G., seek review of the trial court’s nonfi-nal order denying their motion for visitation. We do not have jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order as an interlocutory appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3). However, we elect to treat the Relatives’ timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So. 2d 28 (Fla.2004); A.D. v. KS. (In re S.D.), 869 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA2004).
Petition denied.
DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Sullivan v. Landon Cole Sapp, 866 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 2004)
- In the Interest of S.D. v. K.S., 869 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)