IRA M. AMAZON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2004-02-20
No. 2D03-4440
NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
870 So. 2d 183 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2004)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Amazon v. State, 487 So. 2d 8 (Fla.1986); State v. Enmund, 476 So. 2d 165 (Fla.1985); Wright v. State, 864 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Cook v. State, 816 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Mobley v. State, 590 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with: Kirtsey v. State, 855 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Macias v. State, 614 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (13 total)

View all 13 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw