IN THE INTEREST OF J.T., A CHILD. C.T., MOTHER, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
ALTENBERND, Chief Judge.
This is another case in which an order adjudicating a child dependent was entered based upon a “default.” The Department of Children and Family Services concedes error. For the same reasons that we reversed in K.K. v. Department of Children & Families, 862 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), T.E.D. v. Department of Children & Families, 867 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), S.B. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 858 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and G.A. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 857 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we reverse in this case. This opinion does not require the trial court to alter custody or current visitation rights, but the trial court must review these issues and make a lawful decision as soon as possible following issuance of our mandate.
Reversed and remanded.
WHATLEY and CANADY, JJ„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In the Interest of I.A. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 857 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- In the interest of B.B. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 858 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- In the interest of E.S. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 862 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Galen Golden v. Crow, 862 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- In the Interest of C.D. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 867 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)