FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
VENSY JONES, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2004-03-24
No. 4D03-2465
Polen, J., May, J., Damoorgian, Dorian K., Associate Judge
867 So. 2d 1278 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Family Dollar's appeal of a trial court cost award is partially reversed because expert witness fees for a deposition not used at trial cannot be taxed as costs.


Holding

Expert witness fees for depositions not used at trial cannot be taxed as costs.


Headnotes

[1] Expert witness fees for depositions not used at trial cannot be taxed as costs under Florida law and the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actio…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“It is not appropriate to tax as costs the fees of witnesses who are neither qualified as experts by the court nor testify at trial”

Thellman v. Tropical Acres Steakhouse, Inc., establishing the rule against taxing fees for non-testifying witnesses

Facts & Procedural History

Family Dollar appealed a trial court judgment awarding costs to the appellee, including a $400 expert witness fee for a witness whose deposition was n…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc., (“Family Dollar”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment which awarded the Appellee costs. We reverse as to the taxation of costs of a $400 expert witness fee when the witness did not testify at trial and his deposition was not used at trial. See Thellman v. Tropical Acres Steakhouse, Inc., 557 So. 2d 683, 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 1900) (stating that “[i]t is not appropriate to tax as costs the fees of witnesses who are neither qualified as experts by the court nor testify at trial”); Otis Elevator Co. v. Bryan, 489 So. 2d 1189,1190-91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (stating that “the taxation of expert witness fees for discovery depositions taken in preparation for trial simply because the attorney says that he used the discovery deposition to prepare for cross examination of the witness at trial” was improper). Furthermore, the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions specifically states that expert witness fees “for the giving of a deposition when the deposition is not used in whole or in part at the trial ... should not be taxed as a cost item.” Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (containing the administrative order reciting section 2G of the guidelines).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm as to all other issues on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED AND REMANDED in part.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN K„ Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …no “prevailing party” entitled to tax costs. It is doubtful that the expert witness fee could be taxed as a cost where the witness did not testify at trial and his deposition was not used at a trial. See Family Dollar Stores of Fla., Inc. v. Jones, 867 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Colaizzo does not seek recovery under section 92.142, Florida Statutes (2008), a statute that would entitle him to $5 per day and 6 cents per mile. We have been able to find no other statute, and the parties have not cited to an…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw