ANITA NAJIY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLEE
ANITA NAJIY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLEE
867 So. 2d 575
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order of dismissal. See Wade v. Clower, 94 Fla. 817, 114 So. 548 (1927); Faino v. Great West Life Assur. Co., 622 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). The dismissal is without prejudice and is contingent on the Federal Court accepting jurisdiction over the matter. If the Federal Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction over this matter, the parties are free to refile this lawsuit in state court. Affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Najiy v. City OF Miami, 980 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…it was “contingent on the [fjederal [c]ourt accepting jurisdiction over the matter” and that the Officers could refile the action in state court if the federal court “finds that it does not have jurisdiction over this matter.” Najiy v. City of Miami 867 So. 2d 575, 576 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Subsequently, the Officers filed a federal court action alleging unlawful violations of the Florida Civil Rights Act. Unlike the original state court complaint, the federal complaint did not specifically reference the Order…
Authorities Cited
- Neill G. Wade v. Clower, 94 Fla. 817 (Fla. 1927)
- Debora A. Paino v. Great W. Life Assurance Co., 622 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)