ROBYN M. BATEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBYN M. BATEMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
866 So. 2d 211
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to modify her sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The State correctly argues that the order is not appealable. Lee v. State, 662 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The appeal is therefore dismissed.
STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hurst v. State, 876 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Marinelli v. State, 706 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). As for the partial denial of the “Motion to Reduce or Modify Sentence,” we affirm. The denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion is not appealable, see Bateman v. State, 866 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), and, even if the motion is viewed as filed pursuant to 3.800(a), as argued by Hurst, it was properly denied as the alleged errors are not apparent from the face of the record, see Jackson v. State, 803 So. 2d 842, 844 (Fla. 1st…
Authorities Cited
- Anton Levon LEE v. State, 662 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Forney v. State, 662 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)