KENISSA ORTIZ, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wolfe v. Wolfe, 953 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
  …uming all of the expenses of the marital home. The court also ordered the sale of the marital home. In all, each party received approximately $2,000,000 in marital assets. The husband appealed the final judgment, and we affirmed. See Wolfe v. Wolfe, 864 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Within a year of this court’s decision, the former husband filed a petition for modification of alimony. In his petition, the former husband claimed that subsequent to the entry of the final judgment, a substantial and permanen…
• Goldstein v. Goldstein, 90 So. 3d 970 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …ts discretion in failing to require the husband to make at least a partial contribution to the wife’s attorney’s fees, even though the parties’ incomes were not “greatly disparate” after the wife received the alimony award); cf. also Wolfe v. Wolfe, 864 So. 2d 1229, 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (finding no abuse of discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to the wife, where the husband’s income exceeded that of the wife even though the assets were distributed equally between the parties). Accordingly, we reverse and…
• Solomon v. Sofia Vasquez Solomon (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
  …husband, appeals an order taxing attorney’s fees and costs against Sofia Vasquez Solomon, the wife. As, following an evidentiary hearing, the lower tribunal properly considered “the need of the payee and the payor’s ability to pay,” Wolfe v. Wolfe, 864 So. 2d 1229, 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citing Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697, 699 (Fla. 1997)), along with other appropriate factors, the husband has failed to demonstrate the exercise of discretion was “arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable . . . [or that] no r…

Authorities Cited

• Taylor v. State, 818 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
• Hernandez-Molina v. State, 860 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)