TYRONE JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2003-12-23
No. 5D02-2867
THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
861 So. 2d 1278 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See § 90.804(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2000).

THOMPSON, PLEUS and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Silvio Andres Padilla v. State, 905 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …llateral estoppel. Additionally, we note that when the defendant raised his double jeopardy claims in his January 11, 2002 Rule 3.850 motion, his attorney conceded that the defendant’s double jeopardy claims were without merit. See Padilla v. State, 861 So. 2d 1278, 1279 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We therefore affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence on the grounds raised in his December 14, 2004 motion to correct illegal sentence. In denying the defendant’s motion on…
  • Holmes v. State, 870 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …, the court may summarily deny these claims if they are conclusively refuted by the record, and attach those portions of the record to its order, or grant defendant an evidentiary hearing. Peede v. State, 748 So. 2d 253 (Fla.1999); Padilla v. State, 861 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lasprilla v. State, 857 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Reversed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw