MARIO MITCHELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARIO MITCHELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
861 So. 2d 108
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks to have her judgment and sentence corrected. Appellant contends that her sentence was illegal because it was based on an incorrect scoresheet and because her judgment erroneously cited a crime for which she was not charged. After consideration of appellant’s rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, the trial court reimposed the previous sentence without attaching a corrected scoresheet or citing the correct statute in appellant’s judgment. The State concedes that this was error. We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence and remand for correction of the scoresheet and judgment.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.
BOOTH, BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oluwabukola Olawoye and Mulikatou Disu v. Olufisayo Arubuola, 198 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)…s and entering a default must be supported by an .express finding in the order “that the party’s conduct was willful and contumacious.” Schneider v. Spaeth, 133 So. 3d 1167, 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (citations omitted); see also Mullins v. Moneyham, 861 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (reversing order striking pleadings and entering default as sanction for failure to comply with discovery order; order lacked express written findings of willful or deliberate violation); Greenhill v. Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clin…