LARRY SEXTON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dep't OF Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. Bogorff, 35 So. 3d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …; S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Broward County, 665 So. 2d 272, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); NCNB Nat’l Bank of Fla. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 477 So. 2d 579, 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). . Easkold v. Rhodes, 614 So. 2d 495, 498 (Fla.1993); Vorsteg v. Thomas, 853 So. 2d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). . Behm v. Div. of Admin., State Dept. of Transp., 336 So. 2d 579 (Fla.1976) (jury’s function is to weigh credibility and reliability of expert testimony; expert opinion is worth no more than reasons on which it is based;…
• Martin Cnty. v. Polivka Paving, Inc., 44 So. 3d 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
  …nting records showed that it was never on standby. The contractor relies upon two other cases for its argument that the county waived its right by failing to object. The procedural postures of those cases are distinguishable. See Vorsteg v. Thomas, 853 So. 2d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant never objected to sending evidence [*134] to jury on grounds later asserted on appeal); Horne v. Hudson, 772 So. 2d 556, 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (after denial of motion in limine, appellant never objected to evid…
• United Am. Lien & Recovery Corp. & Century Am. Cas. Co. v. Primicerio, 924 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …. Consequently, the bond posted by Century covers any delay damages. Century further asserts that assuming there was a basis on which to forfeit the bond, the award of damages was not based on competent, substantial evidence. See Vorsteg v. Thomas, 853 So. 2d 1102, 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Additionally, “[i]n appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.” Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150…