JOHN S. FAULKNER, APPELLANT,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jude Cazeau v. State, 873 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …sputed at trial), supplemented on reh’g, 845 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur. . We acknowledge that there is language in this court’s opinion in Livingston v. State, 847 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), which could be construed in a manner contrary to the supreme court's holding in Johnson. The issue in Livingston was whether reversal of the aggravated stalking conviction was required as a consequence of the failure to serve th…
• Marquin Mario Tate v. State, 980 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …t charge should have been granted because there was no proof that he had been served with (or otherwise had notice of) the subject injunction. The state concedes error on this issue and we agree with its concession of error. See Livingston v. State, 847 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate defendant’s conviction for violation of a domestic violence injunction. We affirm defendant’s other convictions and sentences. Affirmed in part, Reversed in pa…
• Mickey M. Canavan v. State, 38 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …go to great lengths to avoid service of process, it is reasonable to permit the State to prove that the defendant has actual knowledge of the permanent injunction as a result of actions other than service of process. See, e.g., Livingston v. State, 847 So. 2d 1131, 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (concluding that the State produced sufficient evidence to deny motion for judgment of acquittal on aggravated stalking charge where the temporary injunction served on the defendant notified him of the date of the final hea…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs. v. John M. and Patricia A. Haire, 836 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)