AARON C. HARTZOG, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
NEW YORK YANKEES AND TIG INSURANCE, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Workers' Compensation Statute Of Limitations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Aaron C. Hartzog, Jr., received skilled services provided by a physician in October 1999, and therefore, he received “remedial treatment or attention” as defined by the relevant workers’ compensation statute in effect at the time he was injured, section 440.19(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1991).1 As such, under the specific facts of this case, the Judge of Compensation Claims erred in denying appellant’s claim based on the statute of limitations, section 440.19(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1991).
We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BARFIELD, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur. . This section was substantially and materially amended effective January 1, 1994. See Ch. 93-415, § 23 at 135-136, Laws of Fla. We note that it is unlikely that appellant's Octo-her 1999 visit would qualify as "remedial treatment” under the post-1994 workers' compensation statute. See § 440.19(2), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1994).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maynard v. Household Fin. Corp. III, 861 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…e on a mortgage in a foreclosure action); see also Norris, 615 So. 2d at 737 (holding that a compulsory counterclaim for fraud may not be severed from the underlying foreclosure action); Millennium Group I, L.L.C. v. Attorneys Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 847 So. 2d 1115, 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (reversing a partial summary judgment that allowed one party to execute a judgment on a promissory note before resolving the other party’s claim of damages because of fraud). At the conclusion of the litigation, a single ju…
-
Peterson v. Affordable Homes OF Palm Beach, Inc., 65 So. 3d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…ed a jury question and is not ordinarily appropriate for summary judgment proceedings.” L & S Food Servs., Inc. v. Roberts Cafeteria, Inc., 422 So. 2d 45, 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). See also Millennium Group I, L.L.C. v. Attorneys Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 847 So. 2d 1115, 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (stating that when summary judgment is granted for one party and a counterclaim on an original claim remains pending, the trial court should stay the execution of the judgment pending the resolution of the remaining claim).…
-
Williamson v. Bradford C. Banta, 22 So. 3d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…at the trial court’s inclusion of the execution language departed from the essential requirements of the law and caused a material injury that cannot be remedied on appellate review. See Millennium Group I, L.L.C. v. Attorneys Title Ins. Fund, Inc., 847 So. 2d 1115, 1116-17 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (holding trial court erred as matter of law by letting execution issue on defendant’s counterclaim when original claim remained pending); Baumann v. Intracoastal Pac. Ltd. P’ship, 619 So. 2d 403, 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence