COMPTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., PETITIONER,

v.

MILAM COMMERCE PARK, LTD., ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Powell v. State, 99 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …the admission of the statement can exist for a significant period of time after the startling event is over. However, the period of time the courts would consider to be significant in this context is most often measured in hours. See Bell v. State, 847 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (admitting a statement made 50 minutes after an attempted kidnapping); Edmond v. State, 559 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (admitting a statement made two or three hours after the offense); Akien v. State, 44 So. 3d 152 (Fla. 4th DC…
• Blandenburg v. State, 890 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …trial-court did not abuse its discretion and should be affirmed. Whether the necessary state of mind is present for a court to admit a statement as an “excited utterance” is a preliminary fact for the trial court’s determination. See Bell v. State, 847 So. 2d 558, 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); State v. Jano, 524 So. 2d 660 (Fla.1988). A trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of a statement as an excited utterance is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See Harmon v. State, 854 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). In…
• Snow v. Crosby, 851 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …shing a record that the defendant was fully apprised of the plea offer, and the full breadth of his exposure if convicted. In my judgment, Warner does not forbid a brief inquiry on this subject. Prado, 816 So. 2d at 1158 n. 2. Accord Bell v. State, 847 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Richardson v. State, 809 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Graff v. State, 843 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Compare Wilson, 845 So. 2d at 158; Nairn v. State, 837 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Cf. also Smith v. State, 842 So. 2d…