ADRIAAN ANGELUS, APPELLANT,
v.
HENRY I. PASS AND EILEEN PASS, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-05-14
No. 3D02-3343
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
847 So. 2d 553 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a letter intended to transfer property upon death must comply with statutory will formalities to be valid.


Facts & Procedural History

Deceased wrote a letter to her nephew-in-law stating she wanted to sell her condominium for $100 upon her death. After her death, the nephew-in-law tr…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Angelus appeals an order determining the validity of an “option” for the sale of her deceased mother’s condominium. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

Ruth Snyder wrote a letter to her nephew-in-law, appellee Henry Pass, informing him that she had written a will. The letter indicated that she had not included her condominium in the will and further stated “If I am still here when I die I would like to sell it to you and Eileen [Ms. Snyder’s niece and Henry’s wife] for $100.” Upon Ms. Snyder’s death, Mr. Pass, treating the letter as an option to purchase the condominium, delivered a check for the $100.00, and made a claim against the estate. Upon appellant’s objection to the claim, appellees instituted the instant action for declaratory judgment and specific performance.

The trial court appointed an administrator ad litem to evaluate the claim. In his report, which was adopted by the trial court, the administrator found sufficient consideration for the agreement and determined the letter to be a valid option contract.

We cannot agree with this ruling which in effect sanctions a testamentary transfer of property that does not comply with the statutory requirements of a will. See § 732.502, Fla. Stat. (2001); Williams v. Williams, 149 Fla. 454, 6 So. 2d 275 (1942) (“If the intention is manifest that the deed should not take immediate effect, but shall be operative only upon the grantor’s death, it will never take effect at all unless it is executed with such formalities that it may be given effect -as a testamentary disposition”) We, therefore, reverse the judgment below and remand for further proceedings.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw