RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS OF PALM BEACH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
X-RAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND ADVANCED IMAGING NETWORK, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Damages Calculation cases and more on FLexlaw
STERN, KENNETH D„ Associate Judge.
We affirm the Final Judgment rendered in favor of appellee, X-Ray Equipment Co., Inc. in all respects but one: the calculation of the monetary award. We remand this cause with directions to the trial court to enter a revised Final Judgment amending the monetary award in at least two respects: First, as the record clearly indicates that the CT scan machine was not included in the contract at issue, the $19,500.00 in lost profit attributable to the prospective sale should be deducted from the award. Second, the amount of cost for the two fluoro rooms should have been $24,000.00, not $12,000.00. Accordingly, the trial court shall recalculate the monetary award, and make the appropriate adjustments thereto.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walker v. Cash Register Auto Ins. OF Leon Cnty., Inc., 946 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…plies to actions taken, positions maintained or papers filed subsequent to October 1, 1999,” the effective date of the statute); Mullins v. Kennelly, 847 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The Third District has held similarly. See Bisson v. Arellano, 844 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). While the court in Maxwell Building Corp. v. Euro Concepts, LLC, 874 So. 2d at 711, was not considering retroactive application of subsection (4), the court did describe subsection (4) as “a procedural change” to the statute. We…
-
Arellano v. Lisette Arellano Bisson and Lower Randolph J. Bisson, 847 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…COPE, J., concurs. .See 3d DCA Case No. 3D98-1318. Purportedly, the appellants could not afford to order the transcripts necessary to consummate their appeal. . See Arellano v. Bisson, 761 So. 2d 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). . See Bisson v. Arellano, 844 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).…
-
Hampton v. Cale OF Fort Myers, Inc., 964 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…pplies to actions taken, positions maintained or papers filed subsequent to October 1, 1999,” the effective date of the statute); Mullins v. Kennedy, 847 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The Third District has held similarly. See Bisson v. Arellano, 844 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Walker, 946 So. 2d at 71. The Walker court also pointed out that in Maxwell this court described the amendment as a “procedural change” to the statute. Hampton argues that because we referred to the amendment as “procedural,” i…