BRIDGETT MARSHALL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a sentencing hearing is mandatory after a finding of guilt and that the trial court reversibly erred by sentencing the appellant immediately without one.
The appellant was found guilty by a jury and immediately sentenced by the trial court without a hearing, despite requesting one. The appellee conceded…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SHAHOOD, J.
We affirm appellant’s conviction on the charge of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Appellant raises as her final point on appeal that the trial court erred in sentencing her in violation of Rule 3.720, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Ap-pellee concedes, and we agree, that the trial court reversibly erred in sentencing appellant without a sentencing hearing.
Appellant in this case, immediately after being found guilty by a jury, requested the trial court to “order a sentencing hearing” in a few weeks to enable the court to “entertain submissions and evidence by the parties that are relevant to the sentence.” The court denied appellant’s request and proceeded to immediately sentence appellant.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720 provides:
Rule 3.720. Sentencing Hearing
As soon as practicable after the determination of guilt and after the examination of any presentence reports, the sentencing court shall order a sentencing hearing. At the hearing:
(a) The court shall inform the defendant of the finding of guilt against the defendant and of the judgment and ask the defendant whether there is any legal .cause to show why sentence should not be pronounced....
(b) The court shall entertain submissions and evidence by the parties that are relevant to the sentence.
(emphasis added.)
As noted by appellee in this case, in State v. Scott, 439 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1983), the Florida Supreme Court held that:
Unarguably, the prisoner to be sentenced is facing a critical stage of the criminal proceedings, whether the sentence to be imposed is the immediate result of adjudication of guilt or the result of a successful Rule 3.850 challenge. Thus, a sentencing hearing is mandatory [under] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720....
Accord Collins v. State, 839 So. 2d 862, 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR RE-SENTENCING.
TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Scott, 439 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1983)
- Collins v. State, 839 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)