ODELL BUSH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ODELL BUSH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
843 So. 2d 1025
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Opinion of the Court
WOLF, J.
Appellant raises two issues on appeal: I) Whether the trial court erred in resentencing appellant pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000), without counsel, and II) Whether the conviction in count III for retaliating against a witness could be properly enhanced for use of a firearm when use of a firearm was not alleged in the information. We determine that appellant is correct as to issue I and remand for resentencing. See McDonald v. State, 679 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (holding that defendant is entitled to counsel at resentencing after prevailing on post-conviction motion). We decline to address issue II, as it was not raised in the trial court.
BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- McDONALD v. State, 679 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Busl v. State, 679 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)