PATRICIO NINO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-04-23
No. 3D03-482
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and WELLS, JJ.
843 So. 2d 347 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

In what we treat as a motion to correct judgment raised by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, Patricio Nino asserts that his judgment improperly reflects that he was convicted of a weapons violation in connection with his kidnaping conviction. The kidnaping conviction on the judgment makes reference to both the kidnaping statute, section 787.01, Fla. Stat. (1995), and the weapons and aggravated battery reclassification statute, section 775.087, Fla. Stat. (1995). The state properly concedes that Nino was neither charged with nor convicted of using a weapon or committing an aggravated battery during the kidnaping. For this reason, we remand with directions that the references to section 775.087 be deleted from the judgment. We otherwise find no illegality or impropriety to the judgment and deny the petition.

Petition denied but remanded with directions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mikell v. State, 854 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …ant’s conviction was not enhanced pursuant to Section 775.087, the judgment contains a reference to that Section. Accordingly, we remand the case with directions that any references to Section 775.087 be deleted from the judgment. See Nino v. State, 843 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Affirmed, but remanded with directions.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw