THE PALATINE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
B. BARNES, C. H. SIMPSON, L. CARLSON AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MILTON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case was affirmed on appeal because it was identical in law and facts to a companion case, The Citizens Insurance Company v. B. Barnes, et al., which had already been decided by the court.
Yes, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of the court's decision in the companion case.
“This case was a companion case to that of The Citizens Insurance Company v. B. Barnes, C. H. Simpson, L. Carlson and the First National Bank of Milton.”
Establishes the relationship between this case and a previously decided case.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis case involved an insurance policy dispute and was tried alongside a companion case with identical records, law, and facts, differing only in the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Per Curiam.
This case was a companion case to that of The Citizens Insurance Company v. B. Barnes, C. H. Simpson, L. Carlson and the First National Bank of Milton. The cases were tried together. The records are identical except that they are based upon policies of insurance issued by different insurance companies. The law and the facts applicable to each case are identical.
The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of The Citizens Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, v. B. Barnes, C. H. Simpson, L. Carlson and First National Bank of Milton, defendants in error, filed at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Brown, J., dissents.