DELANE M. FUTCH AND MILTON M. FUTCH, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
DAVE VALENTINE INSURANCE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
DELANE M. FUTCH AND MILTON M. FUTCH, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
DAVE VALENTINE INSURANCE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
840 So. 2d 379
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Hilyer Sod, Inc. v. Willis Shaw Express, Inc., 817 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Materiale, 787 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wendel v. Wendel, 958 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…was subject to criminal contempt, it did not state the essential facts constituting the contempt or attach the contempt motion, nor did it afford her a reasonable time for preparation of a defense. See Pugliese, 347 So. 2d at 426; Flanagan v. State, 840 So. 2d 379, 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Young v. Wood-Cohan, 727 So. 2d 322, 324 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Russ v. State, 622 So. 2d 501, 502 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Noncompliance with rule 3.840 constitutes fundamental error. Hunt v. State, 659 So. 2d 363, 364 (Fla. 1st…
-
Bret Mayo v. Kerry Mayo O/ B/ O Natalie Gracyn Mayo and Madeline Olivia Mayo, 260 So. 3d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…eficient in this case. The order did not state the essential facts constituting the charged contempt, and the petition filed by Ms. Mayo was not attached to the order. See Mix v. State, 827 So. 2d 397, 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Flanagan v. State, 840 So. 2d 379, 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); cf. Brown v. State, 595 So. 2d 259, 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (holding that show cause order was sufficient because it incorporated and attached the former wife's sworn petition). Nor did the order put Mayo on notice that…
Authorities Cited
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Materiale, 787 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Braswell v. State, 817 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)