ARMANDO PEREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
GLORIA PEREZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2003-02-12
No. 3D01-1661
Before COPE, GREEN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
840 So. 2d 319 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed. The trial court’s rulings regarding the primary residence of the child of the marriage were within its discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980); § 61.13(2), (3), Florida Statutes (2002). The appellant complains that a visitation schedule has not yet been established by the parties, but the final judgment reserves jurisdiction for the court to resolve that issue if the parties are unable to reach agreement.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Alfonso-Roche v. State, 199 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …justify a valid downward departure. The reasons for a valid downward departure are subject to appellate review, “in stark contrast to upward departures for which reasons, need not be given at all” under the Criminal Punishment Code. State v. Faulk, 840 So. 2d 319, 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (Sharp, J., concurring). By reestablishing judicial discretion up to statutory, máximums, the Code makes a return to pre-1983 law. The Code embraces the same modified indeterminate sentencing structure that predated the Sen…
  • Cooper v. State, 877 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 921.002(g), Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Faulk, 840 So. 2d 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). SAWAYA, C.J., MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw