QUINTIN FERGUSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2003-02-21
No. 1D02-4206
ERVIN, BOOTH and BROWNING, JJ„ concur.
837 So. 2d 1161 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2003) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated appeal from the March 20, 2002, order rendered in Gadsden County Circuit Court case number 96-759 CFA. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and BROWNING, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Edelstein v. Beagell, 7 So. 3d 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
    …rder on appeal did not “finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person,” so as to be appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(a)(2). See Dempsey v. Dempsey, 899 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). The appellee’s “Motion to Dismiss and/or Require Appellant to Properly Designate the Record on Appeal,” filed on January 15, 2008, as well as the “Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial Brief,” filed on Janua…
  • Somogyi v. Nevai, 920 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
    …l and [*829] Related Relief’ does not finally determine a right or obligation of an interested person under Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(a)(2), where it merely denies a motion to dismiss and does not revoke the probate of the will. See Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Dismissed. WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.…
  • ….” We are bound by this decision. Moreover, we note that we dismissed an appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss a petition in Somogyi v. Nevai, 920 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The first district ruled similarly in Sanchez v. Masterhan, 837 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). In re Estate of Pavlick, 697 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), cited by appellants, is distinguishable and unpersuasive authority in this case. The denial of the motions to dismiss in this case merely decided that appellees had st…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw