JENNIFER BACH, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stare Decisis cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 808 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which adopted the analysis of the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 793 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), quashed, 829 So. 2d 891 (Fla.2002). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 829 So. 2d 891 (Fla.2002), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
- Cordette Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Fla., Inc., 829 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 2002)
- Cordette Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Fla., Inc., 793 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Bach v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 808 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)