SAINT THOMAS NONOMME, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAINT THOMAS NONOMME, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
834 So. 2d 963
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2003)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Contrary to appellant’s assertion, the plea colloquy reveals that the appellant was advised of the immigration consequences of his plea. The order denying the motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Franco v. State, 897 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the allegation that the appellant was not advised of the immigration consequences of her plea was clearly refuted by the record. Nonomme v. State, 834 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Further, the trial court’s summary denial was proper where the trial court attached the transcript of the plea colloquy and the rights waiver form to the order denying relief. See Oliver v. State, 691 So. 2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 1st…