CORAL GABLES LUMBER & SUPPLY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
EMMA M. SILBEREISEN, NEE EMMA S. MERRITT, AND WILLIAM A. SILBEREISEN, HER HUSBAND, C. E. HALEY, SEMINOLE BOND & MORTGAGE COMPANY, AND C. A. AVANT, AS TRUSTEES, RAILEY-MILAM HARDWARE CO., ATLAS ROCK COMPANY, AND EDGAR P. SUTTON, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree without detailed analysis, relying on prior precedent. The appellate court found no errors in the chancellor's decision.
No, there were no errors in the decree of the chancellor.
“there is no error in the said decree and that the decree of the chancellor should be affirmed upon authority of the opinions in the cases of Agin v. Gainesville Planing & Coffin Co., 80 Fla. 679, 87 So. R. 63; and Lowry v. Downing Manufacturing Co., 80 Fla. 745, 87 So. R. 65.”
This quote explains the court's basis for affirming the lower court's decree.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved an appeal from a decree issued by a circuit court. The specific facts leading to the decree are not detailed in this opinion.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there'is no error in the said decree and that the decree of the chancellor should be affirmed upon authority of the opinions in the cases of Agin v. Gainesville Planing & Coffin Co., 80 Fla. 679, 87 So. R. 63; and Lowry v. Downing Manufacturing Co., 80 Fla. 745, 87 So. R. 65. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the.Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J.. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Agin v. Gainesville Planing & Coffin Co., 80 Fla. 679 (Fla. 1920)
- Lowry v. Downing Mfg. Co., 80 Fla. 745 (Fla. 1920)