PEDRO DIAZ-PERNA, APPELLANT,
v.
MARCUS EVENS AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
PEDRO DIAZ-PERNA, APPELLANT,
MARCUS EVENS AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
833 So. 2d 795
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Pedro Diaz-Perna appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
Under the unemployment compensation law, an employee is disqualified for benefits when “he or she has voluntarily left his or her work without good cause attributable to his or her employing unit .... ” § 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this case the appellant quit his employment because he believed he was going to be terminated or have his salary reduced. Under the unemployment compensation law, that constitutes voluntarily leaving the employment without good cause attributable to the employing unit. Id. Thus, unemployment benefits were correctly denied under the applicable statute.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Perrone v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Wealthbuilders Fin. Grp., 40 So. 3d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…ing unemployment compensation benefits for voluntarily leaving work without good cause attributable to the employing unit. Fear of being fired does not constitute good cause for quitting one’s job under section 443.101(l)(a). See Diaz-Pema v. Evens, 833 So. 2d 795, 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (affirming order denying unemployment benefits where appellant quit his job because he believed he either was going to be fired or would suffer a pay cut). AFFIRMED. WEBSTER, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ. concur.…