THEODORE DONCHEY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLOWERS BY TONY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND RUBEN PADILLA, APPELLEES
THEODORE DONCHEY, APPELLANT,
FLOWERS BY TONY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND RUBEN PADILLA, APPELLEES
832 So. 2d 193
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Zane v. Coastal Unilube, Inc., 774 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Marsa v. Lopez, 400 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Young v. State, 189 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…985), cases will occur in which just describing “the actual matters which cause the possible conflict would ... violate the attorney-client privilege,” and the trial court must accept the public defender’s representations.. Accord Horan v. O’Connor, 832 So. 2d 193, 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (“We see no need for this counsel to explain why he wishes to withdraw in more detail, as such an explanation could be detrimental to the client or protected by the attorney-client privilege.”). We conclude by noting that p…
-
Waltzer v. Conrad & Scherer, LLP (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Zane v. Coastal Unilube, Inc., 774 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Maesa v. Lopez, 400 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)