WASHINGTON LOUIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WASHINGTON LOUIS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
831 So. 2d 762
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Washington Louis seeks reversal of the trial court’s revocation of his probation, arguing that the evidence was insufficient and that the admission of hearsay testimony violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses against him. We affirm the revocation of Louis’ probation, but remand the case for entry of a written order of revocation. See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 717 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bean v. State, 949 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…s a first degree felony, which the trial court was obliged to enhance to a life felony pursuant to section 775.087(l)(a) (use of a weapon), and that, at the time of the offense, life felonies were not subject to habitualization. See Thomas v. State, 831 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The state agrees this claim is cognizable, but contends that Bean is not entitled to relief because he failed to attach the required sentencing records to his motion. We reject this argument. In denying a legally sufficient 3.80…
-
Reeves v. State, 88 So. 3d 964 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…without violating Hale. Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992 (Fla.1993) (approving Second District’s decision affirming imposition of two concurrent guidelines sentences, to be served consecutively to defendant’s several HFO sentences); Thomas v. State, 831 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (noting that consecutive sentencing on two counts was not improper where defendant was sentenced as habitual offender on only one of them); Lafleur v. State, 661 So. 2d 346, 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (vacating habitual sentences for…
Authorities Cited
- Mitchell v. State, 717 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)