WATT THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Watt Thomas appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Fla. R.Crim. P. in which he challenged the Department of Correction’s calculation of his release date, and its treatment of gain time and other credits. We affirm the order under review without prejudice to appellant’s ability to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court after he fully exhausts his administrative remedies. He may have done so already, but the record is not entirely clear on that. King v. State, 665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Robinson v. State, 818 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Clements v. State, 761 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED.
STONE, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Canete v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 967 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…n inmate dissatisfied with an administrative action of DOC is required to exhaust available administrative remedies. See, e.g., Pugh v. State, 954 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Borroto v. State, 943 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Thomas v. State, 828 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Verrone v. State, 797 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Rood v. State, 790 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).3 In short, Canete’s claim for mandamus relief did not become ripe for judicial review until the administrative grievance p…
-
Grace v. State, 920 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…ections’ calculation of his maximum release date, without prejudice to his seeking mandamus or habeas relief from the appropriate circuit court if necessary after he has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Department. See Thomas v. State, 828 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); [*720] Smith v. State, 785 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); see also Key v. State, 874 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citing Johnson v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 841 So. 2d 615, 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), for the proposition that a man…
-
McMinn v. State, 219 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Lindquist v. State, 155 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Durant v. State, 177 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (en banc); Walden v. State, 112 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Thomas v. State, 828 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). LaROSE, CRENSHAW, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clements v. State, 761 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Hickey v. Dunn & Corey, 761 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Galarza v. State, 818 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Jennings v. State, 665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
- Jawan King v. State, 665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)