A.O., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
A.O., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
826 So. 2d 500
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hunter v. State, 660 So. 2d 244 (Fla.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1128, 116 S.Ct. 946, 133 L.Ed.2d 871 (1996); Jacobson v. State, 375 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So. 2d 758 (Fla.1980); Homer v. State, 149 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DK Arena, Inc. v. EB Acquisitions I, LLC, 31 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…n enforceable joint venture agreement. At best, DK Arena and EB had an “agreement to agree” on a joint venture in the future, which does not give rise to a contract that entitles a party to recover damages for breach. See Bergman v. DeI [*327] ulio, 826 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).5 To find that an enforceable contract arose in a case like this one would turn business negotiations into seas of peril, from which contractual liability could later rise to bite a good faith negotiator. An oral joint venture a…
-
Greenbrook NH, LLC v. The Est. OF Alene M. Sayre, 150 So. 3d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…). This case involves only the first issue — whether, despite a photocopying error, the arbitration agreement is valid. There can be no quarrel that a contract cannot stand if it is missing the “essential terms of an agreement.” Bergman v. DeIulio, 826 So. 2d 500, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The essential terms of an arbitration agreement include “the form and procedure for arbitration, the number of arbitrators, how the arbitrators were to be selected, or ... the issues to be decided by arbitration.” Malone &…
-
Cary Portner v. Gil Koppel and Aleksandra Koppel, 382 So. 3d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)…n agreement must be sufficiently specific, and reflect assent by the parties to all essential terms. . . . Where essential terms of an agreement remain open, subject to future negotiation, there can be no enforceable contract.” Bergman v. DeIulio, 826 So. 2d 500, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (citation omitted). Emails between attorneys can constitute an enforceable settlement agreement. See Warrior Creek Dev., Inc. v. Cummings, 56 So. 3d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Competent substantial evidence supports the tria…
Authorities Cited
- Hunter v. State, 660 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1995)
- Horner v. State, 149 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
- Jacobson v. State, 375 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Simmons v. Pennsylvania, 516 U.S. 1128 (U.S. 1996)
- Hunter v. Florida, 516 U.S. 1128 (U.S. 1996)