CARL W. LOHR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1929-05-27
Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., and Giblin, Cir^'euit Judge concur., Strum, J., disqualified.
97 Fla. 913 Florida Supreme Court (1929)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court reversed a trial court's decision to grant an instructed verdict for the defendant, finding that there was sufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claim for injuries.


Holding

Yes, the trial court erred in granting the motion for an instructed verdict because substantial evidence existed to support the plaintiff's claim.


Key Quotes

“there was error in granting the motion of the defendant for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant.”

Establishes the court's finding of error in the lower court's decision.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff, Carl W. Lohr, sued the City of Jacksonville for injuries. The trial court granted the defendant's motion for an instructed verdict, eff…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there was error in granting the motion of the defendant for an instructed verdict in favor of the defendant. There was substantial evidence tending to prove the liability of the defendant to the plaintiff for injuries complained of. Therefore, the judgment should be reversed and it is so ordered. Florida Common Law Practice by Crandall, Sec. 208 and authorities cited; Sec. 4363, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927; 67 Fla. 40.

Reversed.

Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., and Giblin, Cir^'euit Judge concur. Strum, J., disqualified.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw