HAYWARD & ASSOCIATES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
M. DEXTER HOFFMAN, NOEL K. EVANS, EVANS & DONICA, P.A., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court erred by considering an affirmative defense outside the complaint's four corners.
Hayward & Associates, Inc. appealed a trial court order dismissing its lawsuit with prejudice on the grounds of res judicata. The trial court consider…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Four Corners Of The Complaint cases and more on FLexlaw
BLUE, Chief Judge.
Hayward & Associates, Inc., appeals a trial court order that dismissed with prejudice its lawsuit against Dexter Hoffman, Noel Evans, and the law firm of Evans & Donica, P.A. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds of res judicata. As Hayward correctly argues, the trial court erred by going outside the four corners of the complaint to consider this affirmative defense. Accordingly, we reverse. See Bolz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 679 So. 2d 836, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
The Appellees ask this court to affirm on the alternative ground that Hayward is trying to improperly split its causes of action. To reach this conclusion, however, the court would still be basing its decision on the fact of the prior lawsuit, which fact cannot be reached at this procedural point in the case. See Abichandani v. Related Homes of Tampa, Inc., 696 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (reversing order that granted motion to dismiss based on improper splitting of cause of action when the four corners of the complaint did not indicate the prior suit).
Accordingly, we reverse. On remand, the trial court must decide, upon appropriate motions by the parties, how to manage the various complaints filed by Hayward and Associates, either by consolidating them or dismissing one.
Reversed and remanded.
SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Est. OF Delia F. Stephens v. Galen Health Care, Inc., 911 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…te did not sue any of the treating physicians for medical negligence. The Respondents filed a “Motion For Order Authorizing Ex Parte Communications With Former Treating Physicians and Health Care Providers.” The trial court, citing Royal v. Harnage, 826 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), granted the motion to allow the Respondents’ attorneys to communicate ex parte with any physicians and other health care providers responsible for treating Ms. Stephens during the time alleged in the complaint. The Estate petitio…1 / 2
-
Joseph Lemieux and his wife v. Tandem Health Care OF Fla., Inc., 862 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…ting matters statutorily privileged ... would cause ‘cat out of the bag’ harm.” Melody v. State, Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 706 So. 2d 115, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing Martin-Johnson, 509 So. 2d at 1099); see also Royal v. Harnage, 826 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (reviewing by certiorari a discovery order that purportedly violated the statutory physician-patient privilege). Thus, we have certiorari jurisdiction to review the order at issue. Turning to the merits, we agree with Mr. Lemieux…1 / 2
-
LEE Mem'l Health Sys. v. Smith, 40 So. 3d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…gedly privileged pretrial communications between a hospital and physician is difficult to assess, courts have repeatedly viewed such orders as resulting in material injury of an irreparable nature for purposes of certiorari review. Royal v. Harnage, 826 So. 2d 332, 337 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (citing Alachua [*108] Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Stewart, 649 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Pub. Health Trust of Dade Cnty. v. Franklin, 693 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Manor Care of Dunedin, Inc. v. Keiser, 611 So. 2d 1305 (…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bolz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 679 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Krishin P. Abichandani v. Related Homes OF Tampa, Inc., 696 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)