QUINTON ROGERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
QUINTON ROGERS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
824 So. 2d 1041
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Betancourt v. State, 804 So. 2d 313 (Fla.2001).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jairo Ortiz v. Lorie, 921 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…afe premises to a business invitee and to warn the invitee of any latent perils which are known or should be known to the owner but which are not known, or by the exercise of reasonable care could not be known, to the invitee. See Portal v. Asencio, 824 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Because [*870] the homeowner did not know of any defects, his knowledge could not be superior to that of Ortiz. Moreover, the defects were capable of being seen by the expert from the pictures. Thus, Lorie also contended that the…1 / 2
-
Quinton Rogers v. State, 970 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2006); Rogers v. State, 824 So. 2d 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002);…
Authorities Cited
- Betancourt v. State, 804 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 2001)