DOUGLAS NICKLES, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
DOUGLAS NICKLES, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
821 So. 2d 449
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. See Gove v. Florida Parole Com’n, 816 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
MINER, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. State, 887 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 2004)…n wording applies only to a ‘conviction’ for the offense prescribed by the present statute.” Id. at 593. In a recent decision, the First District also certified conflict with the decision in Thompson on this very issue. See Stutts [*1263] v. State, 821 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). In Stutts, the First District decided that the defendant’s prior DWLS convictions in Alabama could not be the basis for an enhanced felony DWLS offense under the amended section 322.34(2) because the Alabama statute contained no…1 / 2
-
Comer H. Bryan, III v. State, 862 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…they could not be used as a predicate to enhance a defendant’s sentence from a misdemeanor to a third-degree felony. Id. at 593. . We note that the First District has certified conflict with this district's opinion in Thompson. See Stutts v. State, 821 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).…
Authorities Cited
- Gove v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 816 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)