MICHAEL GRAHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL GRAHAM, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
820 So. 2d 1092
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in appellant’s first point on appeal. We do, however, agree that appellant cannot be legally convicted and sentenced for the crimes of possession of cocaine within one thousand feet of a school and possession of cocaine based on his possession of multiple quantities of cocaine at the same time and place. See Grene v. State, 702 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Tucker v. State, 608 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s conviction and sentence on the charge of possession of cocaine with intent to sell and remand for discharge on that count.1
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
. The State concedes error on this issue.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Watson Grene v. State, 702 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Tucker v. State, 608 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)