JAIR VENTURA ROMERO, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 2002-04-10
No. 3D01-3582
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
820 So. 2d 946 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because the defendant’s motion for continuance effected a waiver of his speedy trial rights, see State v. Guzman, 697 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), the application for writ of prohibition is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jair Ventura Romero v. State, 870 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 2004)
    …Romero, has filed a motion for reinstatement of a notice seeking to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of this Court. Romero asserts that there is express and direct conflict between the Third District Court of Appeal decision in Romero v. State, 820 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), and multiple decisions from the First, Second, and Fourth District Courts of Appeal. Before we can determine whether we will exercise our discretion to accept this case for review under article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw